Patent Mediation Success – The Shelter Company v. Stewards Solution

Late in July, two long-time business partners – The Shelter Company (a modular structure specialist) and Steward’s Solution (an F&B and hospitality solutions provider) – successfully resolved a high-stakes patent dispute through mediation at the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center in Singapore. 

 

The Shelter Company, exclusive licensee of the Singapore patent for its “Tubelar” modular structures, accused Steward’s Solution of infringing its patent after the latter deployed alternative structures at the Singapore Grand Prix in 2024. Steward’s Solution countered with claims of patent invalidity and groundless threats. What had once been a strong partnership (2009–2023) was now strained by rising costs and diverging business needs.

 

The Mediation Process

Rather than fight it out in court, the parties turned to the WIPO-ASEAN Mediation Programme (AMP+), which also offered partial cost reimbursement. This program is also managed by the IP Office of Singapore (IPOS). Over an eight-and-a-half-hour session, mediator Jonathan Agmon guided the parties through joint discussions and private “shuttle sessions,” exploring both legal and commercial concerns.


Crucially, both sides expressed openness to continue working together if commercial terms were fair. The mediator highlighted that the companies were not competitors but complementary businesses, shifting the focus from conflict to collaboration. With skilled facilitation, the parties reached common ground and signed a settlement agreement before the end of the day.


Challenges and Breakthroughs

  • New concerns emerged during opening statements, requiring creative solutions.

  • Parties struggled over valuation gaps, but compromise was achieved by focusing on business synergies and litigation risks.

  • Emotional exchanges were reframed constructively, keeping the dialogue productive.

Reflections and Impact

The mediation underscored that litigation is often costly, uncertain, and relationship-damaging, while mediation provides space for candid dialogue and innovative solutions. Both sides noted they would strongly consider mediation again—even without funding support.


The case also demonstrated that even complex patent disputes can be effectively settled outside of court, provided parties focus on future opportunities rather than past grievances.


Conclusion

This success story shows how mediation can bridge business, legal, and emotional divides, turning potential fractures into constructive resolutions. For businesses, especially in IP-heavy industries, mediation offers a cost-effective, time-efficient, and relationship-preserving alternative to litigation.


Special thanks to IPOS, WIPO (Calbe Goh) and the Shadow Mediator, Ms Nillaa K Pillay.


For the Full Decision Report (published as The Shelter Company Pte Ltd & Steward’s Solution Pte Ltd, [2025] AMP+ MED 2) see here.
Agmon Law

Add Your Heading Text Here

Scroll to Top

Megan Tay

Associate (legal) 

Intellectual Property, Commercial, M&A, Litigation

Bio: Ms. Tay joined Agmon Law after acquiring her experience in a number of international law firms and has completed her training at one of the largest Singapore law firms. She has experience in litigation and intellectual property, and her practices focuses on trademarks prosecution and litigation, as well as commercial law. 

Admissions: Waiting Admission – Member of the Bar of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Singapore since 2026.

Memberships: 

Education: Law LLB from National University of Singapore– 2024

Languages: English, Chinese.

Liangshu Huang

Patent Associate

Intellectual Property, Patents, Litigation Support

Bio: Mr. Huang joined Agmon Law after working in an international patent law firm in Singapore. Mr. Huang assists with patent related drafting and prosecution including in the fields of medical devices, mechanical, biotech, software related inventions, CRI, physics, and defense. Mr. Huang brings to the team the experience and precision required in the field of patents. 

Education: Graduate Certificate in Intellectual Property Law, National University of Singapore (2015-2016)

MRES in Translational Medicine, Imperial College London (2009-2010)

Upper 2nd Class Honors in Biomedical Sciences, University of Bradford (2006-2008)

Languages: English, Chinese and Malay.

Jonathan Agmon

Founder & Director

Intellectual Property, Commercial, M&A, Litigation

Bio: With thirty over years of experience Jonathan specializes in intellectual property, commercial law and litigation. Jonathan established Agmon Law in 2025 after 25 years with Soroker Agmon Nordman, which he co-founded. He is a technologist-turned-lawyer and has represented numerous companies over the years. Aside from prosecution and transactional work, Jonathan also handles contentious matters such as oppositions and cancellations proceedings, and acts both as counsel and arbitrator in litigation, mediations and arbitration. His technology background is in computing and he still codes today having coded some of the Firm’s systems. 

Admissions: Foreign Registered Lawyer (Singapore) – 2016; Attorney and Counselor at Law (New York, United States) – 1996; Advocate, (Israel) – 1995

U.S. District Court, Southern and Northern District of New York; United States Court of Federal Claims.

Memberships: Member of CIArb; Internet Committee at ECTA – European Communities Trademark Association; APAA, INTA (Pro Bono Comittee); Domain Name Panelist (WIPO, FORUM, ADNDRC (HK), ISOC-IL, MFSD)

Education: Master of Laws (LL.M. Intellectual Property), George Washington University Law School – 1996; Bachelor of Laws (LL.B. Hons.), University of East London – 1993; Beijing Languages University: Chinese (Mandarin) – 2009

Languages: English, Hebrew, Chinese-Mandarin (Work in progress), Japanese (working on it…)