Historical Replication Notice This page is a faithful replication of a historical work originally published in 1996 as a website by Jonathan Agmon, Stacey Halpern and David Pauker while LL.M. candidates at The George Washington University Law School. It is reproduced here by Agmon Law Pte. Ltd. for historical and educational purposes. The content reflects the law, technology and internet infrastructure as they existed in 1996 and has not been updated. Nothing on this page constitutes legal advice. Most hyperlinks referenced in the original no longer function.
What's in a Name? (1996) › Disputes Concerning Domain Names
Domain Name Disputes
  • Introduction to Domain Names Disputes
  • Domain Name Grabbing
  • Not Quite Domain Name Grabbing
  • Logical Choices?: Part I — Someone Else's Trademark
  • Logical Choices?: Part II — Not Quite Someone Else's Trademark
  • Not Quite Domain Names

Alphabetical Case List:

  • Apple v. Mark Newton
  • Arab.net
  • Avon
  • Banana Republic
  • Candyland — Hasbro v. Internet Entertainment Group
  • Council of Better Business Bureaus, Inc.
  • Dole96
  • Fry's Electronics, Inc. v. Frenchy Frys
  • The Gap
  • Intel v. Robert Collins
  • Inter-Law v. Interlaw
  • Kaplan Education Centers v. Princeton Review
  • KCRA
  • KnowledgeNet, Inc.
  • McDonald's
  • micros0ft
  • MTV v. Adam Curry
  • NovaStar
  • PETA
  • RoadKills-R-Us
  • Roadrunner
  • Sun
  • Taiwan.com
  • Teubner & Associates, Inc.
  • Wired v. Wire
Introduction to Domain Name Disputes

Disputes have arisen over intentional domain name registrations of well known trademark as well as inadvertent registrations and uses of domain names identical to or similar to trademarks. The dispute between The 'Lectric Law Library, the registered owner of the "inter-law.com" domain name and the owners of the registered trademark Interlaw and the dispute between Roadrunner Computer Systems and Warner Brothers demonstrate the existence of many of the unresolved questions.

For example, does or should the law recognize domain names as trademarks? When does the use of someone else's trademark as a domain name constitute infringement? Should NSI conduct trademark searches similar to the Patent and Trademark Office before registering a domain name?

Further problems arise because domain names share cyberspace with the entire globe, without the normal geographic restraints of traditional trademarks. Does this mean that foreign domain names similar or identical to U.S. tradenames are also potential targets in an unfair competition trademark infringement action? Conversely, are U.S. domain names targets in foreign litigation?

Several scenarios exist where more than one person would want to register the same domain name, thus giving rise to a "domain name dispute."

One example is where someone intentionally registering a domain name that someone else uses as a tradename or trademark to prevent the owner from establishing a web site under the name, to force the trademark owner to pay a sum of money to acquire the name, or simply for the reaction. These types of disputes are dubbed "Domain Name Grabbing."

Another illustrations is someone registering a domain name knowing it is someone else's trademark, company name or slogan. However, unlike a domain name grabber, the registering party does not intend to hold the name for hostage, but instead intends to use the domain name. A problem arises because visitors to a web site found using that domain name often expect to find the official page of the registered trademark owner or the person or organization identified by the domain name.

There are also "innocent registrations." These situations involve registrations and uses of domain names which are logical and accurate choices for the companies, organizations or services. However, coincidentally, the domain name is also someone else's trademark or very similar to someone else's trademark. We call these disputes "Logical Choice." Part I deals with identical names and Part II discusses similar names.

This web site summarizes disputes arising in these four categories. We also explore a group of dispute, which we have entitled "Not Quite Domain Names," that do not involve the actual domain name, but the title of the Web Site.

For general information about domain name disputes:

http://www.cojk.com/nsi.htm McDonald's Tried to Find The Beef in Domain Name Registration.
http://www.primenet.com/wiredlaw/domain.htm Who Can Stake a Claim in Cyberspace? WiredLaw, by Michael Leventhal, Esq.
http://pathfinder.com/@@gukvDaKdoQMAQEaq/fortune/magazine/1995/951016/newstrends What's in a Name? On The Internet You'd Never Guess, by Ani Hadjian.
http://www.hyperstand.com/SITE/Vox/cyberlaw.html#story3 A Domain, By Any Other Name, by Patricia Gima.
http://www.smh.com.au/columns/synapses-951017.html Pirates find big money in names, by Peter Leonard.
http://www.ior.com/~malhotra/domain.html Internet Domain Names and TM Law.
http://www.gcwf.com/articles/yourname.htm Do You Own Your Name In Cyberspace.
Domain Name Grabbing

Kaplan Education Centers v. Princeton Review

Princeton Review, a provider of training for standardized tests, registered two domain names, "review.com" and "kaplan.com." Kaplan Education Center is Princeton Review's primary competitors. When Kaplan decided to set up a web site, it discovered that Princeton had beaten it to the punch. The matter went to arbitrations, and ultimately Princeton relinquished the domain name.

For more information on Kaplan:

http://www.inter-law.com/files/inp11 Domain names and trademarks, by James Evan.
http://www.inter-law.com/files/inp12 Trademark: Excerpts From Intellectual Property and the National Information Infrastructure: The Report of the Working Group on Intellectual Property Rights, Bruce A. Lehman, Chair.
http://www.kaplan.com Kaplan Education Center's Home Page.
http://www.review.com Princeton Review's Home Page.
http://www.faegre.com/areas/areaip03.html#thenet Hot Topics in the Law of Trademark and Trade Dress — The Internet.

McDonalds

Joshua Quittner, a writer for WIRED magazine registered the domain name "mcdonalds.com," to demonstrate the problems with NSI's registration system. After some prompting by Quittner, McDonald's donated money to a charity in exchange for the domain name.

For more information on McDonald's:

http://www.seas.gwu.edu/student/kmhebert/alt.mcdonalds.html Frequently Asked Questions About McDonalds.
http://www.smartdocs.com/~migre.v/wired.com/1-22.html HotWIRED, September 23, 1994 — News of the WIRED, InterNIC Quashes Quittner's mcdonalds.com.
http://www.smartdocs.com/~migre.v/wired.com/1-23.html HotWIRED, September 30, 1994 — An update on mcdonalds.com.
http://www.hotwired.com/People/Bios/Quittner.j/index.html Joshua Quittner's Home Page.
http://www.hotwired.com/wired/2.10/departments/electrosphere/mcdonalds.html Billions registered, by Joshua Quittner.

Council of Better Business Bureaus, Inc.

Mark Sloo registered the domain names "bbb.com" and "bbb.org" in an attempt to force the Council of Better Business Bureaus (commonly referred to as "BBB" or "CBBB") to buy the domain names. CBBB brought an action for unfair competition and trademark infringement in U.S. District Court in Kansas City — Council of Better Business Bureaus, Inc. v. Mark Sloo, No. 95-0473-CV-W-2 (Filed May 8, 1995). Until the lawsuit settle, the Better Business Bureaus used the domain name "cbbb.org." Upon settlement of the lawsuit, the domain name changed to "bbb.org" because the Better Business Bureaus felt that "bbb" was more recognized by the public, as well as, easier to remember and access.

For more information on the CBBB:

http://www.bbb.org The Better Business Bureaus' Web Server.
http://www.bbb.org/media/source2.html#suit CBBB Successfully Settles Lawsuit to Protect its Trademark on the Internet.

Avon

Carnetta Wong Associates registered the domain name "avon.com." Avon brought an action in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (CV 96 0451). The complaint accuses Carnetta Wong Associates of unfair competition, trademark infringement, misappropriation, trademark dilution, and deceptive acts and practices. Avon's case marked one of the first suit alleging a count under the new Federal Trademark Dilution Act. Avon has successfully reclaimed the domain name "avon.com."

Not on the Internet: See, AVON Suing — Antidilution Trademark Law Gets First Court Case: Personal care company sues to retrieve computer domain. Voorhees Report, Information Law Alter: February 9, 1996, Section: No. 2, Vol. 4; ISSN 1068-8129.

KCRA

KCRA, a Sacramento, California television station registered the domain names "kvie.com," "kpwb.com," and "ktxl.com" — the call letters of three of its competitors. The general manager stated that he requested his local provider register the domain names "for fun." The local provider asked NSI to withdraw the registrations once it discovered the domain names "conflicted" with the other TV Stations.

For more information on KCRA:

http://www.iworld.com/plweb-cgi/idoc.pl?477+unix+free_user+www.netday.com..80+NetDay+iWORLD+Cowles+Simba+Cowles+Simba++kcra iworld — Station Registers Competitors' Internet Addresses.

NovaStar

NovaStar, Inc. is a Peoria, Arizona computer company that recently became an Internet service provider. When it tried to register the domain name "novastar.com," it found that the name was already registered to PrimeNet, a Phoenix-based Internet service provider. Curiously, PrimeNet registered "novastar," in addition to Novastar, who has an Arizona state trademark registration, brought suit against PrimeNet in Maricopa County Superior Court. NovaStar claimed that its Arizona common law rights gave it the right to the use of "novastar" as a domain name. Judge Rebecca Albrecht disagreed and dismissed the case.

Not Quite Domain Name Grabbing

MTV v. Adam Curry

Adam Curry, while employed by MTV as a "VJ," registered the domain name "mtv.com." Curry registered and maintained the site at his own expense and MTV originally showed little interest in the site. MTV claimed right to the domain name upon Curry's departure from MTV. MTV brought action in Federal Court. The parties eventually settled for undisclosed terms.

For more information about MTV:

http://www.inter-law.com/files/inp10 MTV Sues Curry.
http://www.inter-law.com/files/inp11 Domain names and trademarks, by James Evan.
http://www.mcs.net/~sorkin/cyber/mtv.txt MTV Networks v. Curry, 867 F. Supp. 202 (S.D.N.Y. 1994).
http://ww.eff.org/pub/Legal/Cases/curry_v_mtv.announce The Electronic Frontier Foundation: "Legal Cases" Archive — Adam Curry announcement about MTV dispute.

Dole96

"Robert Dole" alias Brooks Talley, a computer test developer, registered the domain name "dole96." The web site "www.dole96.org" features a page labeled "An Official World Wide Web Internet Site." However, the site does suggest that it is not actually the "official" site by claiming that Bob Dole is the "ripe" man for the job.

For more information on Dole96:

http://www.around.com/dirtytricks.html [email protected], by James Gleick — Political Satire, Internet Style.
http://www.dole96.com The Real Bob Dole for President World Wide Web Site.

micros0ft

Zero Micro Software, an Austin, Texas computer software company registered the domain name "micros0ft.com" (microsoft with a zero instead of the second "o"). NSI asked if it could delete the registration, but Zero Micro Software refused. Subsequently, NSI placed the domain name on hold.

Microsoft Corporation sent Zero Micro Software a cease and desist letter claiming that the use of the domain name "micros0ft.com" is likely to confuse consumers and dilute Microsoft Corporation's trademark. Microsoft Corporation allows alleges that Zero Micro Software's company name will also cause confuse and dilute Microsoft Corporation's trademark. Microsoft demanded that Zero Micro Software stop using the domain name and abandon the domain name registration. Microsoft Corporation also demanded that Zero Micro Software also cease and desist its use of the name "Mirco Software" in its company name.

For more information on micros0ft:

http://www.198.6.198.150 Zero Micro Software's Home Page.
http://www.microsoft.com/ Microsoft Corporation's Web Page.
Logical Choices? Part I — Someone Else's Trademark

KnowledgeNet

Allegedly without knowing "KnowledgeNet" was a registered trademark, D.L. Boone & Co. registered the domain name "knowledgenet.com." KnowledgeNet, Inc., the registered trademark owner complained to NSI, but NSI refused to reassign the name. Subsequently, KnowledgeNet, Inc. brought an action against NSI and D.L. Boone. D.L. Boone settled before there was any judicial ruling on the merits.

For more information on KnowledgeNet:

ftp://internic.net/netinfo/knowledgenet.lawsuit. Court Papers Rescribing Knowledgenet Domain Name Lawsuit.

The Gap

The Genesis Project Ltd, the first commercial internet service in Northern Ireland registered the domain name "thegap.com" as an acronym for its internet service name "the genesis access point."

The Gap, Inc. complained to NSI about the registration and use of the domain name. InterNIC sent The Genesis Project Ltd. a letter informing Genesis that unless it possessed a federal trademark registration for name "the gap", the domain name would be placed on hold. The letter included a copy of NSI's retroactive Domain Name Dispute Policy Statement.

In March 1996, NSI placed the domain name on hold. However, after a week NSI restored the domain name. The Genesis Access Point and The Gap, Inc. are "working" on "an amicable agreement."

For more information on The Gap:

http://www.gpl.net The Genesis Project Ltd.
http://www.gpl.net/DomainUnderAttack/ Latest update on "thegap.com" dispute.
http://www.paranoia.com/reading/internicwars.html The Gap throws its weight at an Ireland provider?

Apple's Newton

In 1994 Mark Newton registered the domain name "newton.com" for his bulletin board which offers computer advice. Apple Computers contacted Newton and informed him that he had registered Apple's trademark and that it had rights to the name. Newton refused to relinquish the name so, Apple complained to InterNIC. "newton.com" has been placed on hold until the matter is resolved.

Candyland — Hasbro v. Internet Entertainment Group

Internet Entertainment Group (IEG) registered the domain name "candyland.com" for its adult entertainment site. Hasbro, Inc., the makers of the trademarked game "Candy Land" sought a preliminary injunction, claiming that IEG's use created a negative image in connection with the Candy Land trademark. Although IEG agreed to change its name provided it was given 6 months to change over, it argued that neither the Federal Trademark Dilution Act nor the Washington State trademark dilution statutes protected against tarnishment.

Judge Dwyer, U.S. District Court Judge in Seattle granted the preliminary injunction and enjoined IEG from using the name. The preliminary injunction permits IEG, for 90 days, to refer visitors who access the "candyland.com" web site to its new web site "adultplayground.com."

For more information on Candyland:

http://candyland.com candyland.com
http://www.slip.net/~freelove/pr.html Hasbro Finds "candyland.com" Offensive and Will Not Allow Timely Transition To adultplayground.com.
http://www.cnet.com/Content/News/Files/0.16.570.00.html c|net news — Hasbro finds candyland.com offensive, by Rose Aguilar, February 1, 1996.
http://www.callaw.com/edt305a.html Master of Its Own Domain, The Recorder, March 5, 1996, by Mark Walsh.

Sun

After Sunriver Corp. began using the mark "Sunriver" on products similar to those produced by Sun Microsystems, a California federal court granted a preliminary injunction preventing Sun River's use of any "sun"-based mark in any manner, including as an Internet domain name. Sun Microsystems, Inc. v. Sunriver Corp., 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19012 (N.D.Cal. Sept. 28, 1995).

Not on the Internet: Sun River Ruled Likely to Infringe Sun Microsystems Trademark, The Computer Lawyer, Current Developments; Proprietary Rights Section; Vol. 12, No. 9, pg 31, September 1995.

Logical Choices? Part II — Not Quite Someone Else's Trademark

wired.com and wire.net

Operators of a computer network established to encourage women to be more active on the Internet registered the domain name "wire.com." Wired magazine, one of the most widely read magazines reporting on Internet issues, claimed that the registration was likely to be confused with Wired Magazine's Web Site, and demanded that the Women's Wire stop using the name. Eventually, with some assistance by Wired Magazine the domain name was changed.

For more information on Wired or WWire:

http://www.wwire.net/ Women's Wire Home Page.
http://www.hotwired.com/wired/ Wired Magazine.

roadrunner.com

Roadrunner Computer Systems offers Internet services. In December 1995, Warner Brothers, Inc., the owner of the registered trademark "Road Runner" complained to NSI about Roadrunner Computer Systems, Inc.'s registration and use of the domain name "roadrunner.com." After NSI informed Roadrunner that it would place the domain name on hold, Roadrunner applied for and received a trademark registration in Tunisia. However, NSI still refused to allow Roadrunner to keep the domain name.

Roadrunner filed a complaint against NSI in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (96-413-A). Roadrunner also filed a motion for a preliminary injunction which would prohibit NSI from placing the domain name "roadrunner.com" on hold during the pendency of the litigation.

For more information on Roadrunner:

http://www.patents.com/nsi.sht General information about Roadrunner Dispute.
http://www.patents.com/nsicpt.sht Complaint filed by Roadrunner against NSI.
http://www.roadrunner.com Roadrunner Computer Systems, Inc.'s Home Page.
http://www.roadrunner.com/case.html The Story Behind Roadruuner Up Against NSI.
http://www.warnerbros.com/ Warner Brothers' Home Page.

Inter-law v. Interlaw

Interlaw, Ltd., an international legal organization complained to NSI about the use of the domain name "inter-law.com" by The 'Lectric Law Library, a comprehensive and commonly referenced site. Although Interlaw registered and uses the domain name "interlaw.org," it still wants The 'Lectric Law Library to relinquish the domain name "inter-law.com." Jeff Liebling, the operator of The 'Lectric Law Library claims its domain name does not infringe Interlaw's trademark. He filed a suit in federal court against Interlaw seeking damages and a declaratory judgment.

The history of the dispute, correspondences and the complaint are located at The 'Lectric Law Library's Web Site. The site notes that "its domain name is/will be changing to 'www.lectlaw.com'." Meanwhile, a third-party registered the domain name "interlaw.com."

Teubner & Associates, Inc.

Teubner & Associates, Inc. is a high-technology software company. American International Facsimile Products (AIFP) is one of its direct competitors. AIFP registered a domain name using "Tuebner," a common misspelling of Teubner's name. AIFP also registered the domain name "www.faxgate.com," which is the name of Teubner's product which directly competes with AIFP's Hostfax. Teubner's lawyer's issued a cease and desist letter. All three domain names now take you to Teubner's Home Page.

For more information on Teubner:

http://www.teubner.com/ Teubner's Home Page (also accessible from tuebner.com or faxgate.com).
http://www.AIFP.com/ AIFP's Home Page.

Arab.net

Arab.net, the Internet site serving the Middle East, has sent out warning concerning the registration of domain names such as, Islam, mosque, jihad, Muhammad, and Muslim. Arab.net is concerned with these registration and uses because it wants to ensure that only correct information reaches the Muslims on the Internet.

Taiwan.com

The domain name "Taiwan.com" was registered by Xinhua, the official Chinese news agency, whose affiliate, China Internet Corporation. Needless to say, Taiwan is not too happy about this registration.

For more information on Taiwan.com:

http://www.roc.com/taiwan/ taiwan.com — Just Another Info-Superhighway Roadkill? Or Held Hostage by the Commies?
http://taiwan.com/ China Internet Corporation's Home Page.
Not Quite Domain Names

ROADKILLS-R-US

Roadkills-R-Us, formed on Usenet in 1988, exists solely in cyberspace. Nevertheless, TOYS-R-US has threatened to sue Roadkills-R-US because the "R-US" conflicts with TOYS-R-US registered trademark. The battle with TOYS-R-US has spurred a number of R-US sites including "TORTS-R-US," and "CANS R US."

For more information on RoadKills-R-Us:

http://www.rru.com/rru/ Roadkills-R-Us News Network Home Page.
http://schoneal.com/rru/tru/ Toys-R-Us Giraffe Threatens to Sue Web Page.

Banana Republic

The Gap, Inc. finds itself involved in an Internet dispute over the use of the name "Banana Republic." Banana Republic Embroidery does not use the domain name "bananarepublic.com," or any of approximately 31 domain names The Gap, Inc. registered in the U.S. Nonetheless, The Gap, Inc. and Banana Republic, Inc. have threatened legal action.

Not on the Internet: Communication Gap, Information Week, Front Page, December 18, 1995.

Intel v. Robert Collins

Robert Collins posted a home page entitled "The Intel Secrets' Home Page." He states that the purpose of this page is "to providing information about the Intel Architecture processors." Intel contacted Mr. Collins, informing him that Intel Secrets' logo infringed its trademark. Robert Collins claimed that his Intel Secrets' logo did not infringe Intel's trademark. He also claims that any use of Intel's logo is fair use because his Intel Secrets' logo is a parody. Despite his position, Robert Collins changed his Intel Secrets' logo to make sure Intel recognizes that his use is a parody.

For more information on Intel:

http://www.x86.org/ What Intel Doesn't Want You To Know Home Page.
http://www.x86.org/IntelVsCollins/#Start Summary of Events — Intel v. Robert Collins.
http://www.x86.org/IntelVsCollins/IntelLetter1.html Letter from Intel to Robert Collins.
http://www.x86.org/IntelVsCollins/IntelResponse1.html Robert Collins Letter to Intel.
http://www.intel.com/ Intel Corp.'s Home Page.

Fry's Electronics, Inc. v. Frenchy Frys

Fry's Electronic, Inc., a retail electronic chain based on Palo Alto, California, brought an action against Frenchy Frys, a Seattle seller of french fry vending machines and the Internet service provider who requested the domain for Frenchy Frys after Frenchy Fry's registered the domain name "frys.com." (Fry's Electronics, Inc. v. Octave Systems, et al., No. C95-2525 CAL (N.D. Cal.)) In its complaint, Fry's Electronic alleged that Frenchy Frys wrongfully appropriated the Fry's trade name. Because Frenchy Frys was first to register and Fry's Electronics did not have a federal trademark, NSI would not get involved. You will find Frenchy Frys at "frys.com."

For more information on Fry's:

http://www.hyperstand.com/SITE/Vox/cyberlaw.html#story3 A Domain, By Any Other Name, by Patricia Gima, Cyberlaw Journal.

PETA

People Eating Tasty Animals started a web page as a resource for people who enjoy eating meat, wearing fur and leather, hunting, and the fruits of scientific research. People for Ethical Treatment of Animals sent Mike Doughney, the creator of the page, a letter demanding that he turn over the domain name "peta.com." Currently, People Eating Tasty Animals still has the domain name "peta.org."

For more information on PETA:

http://www.infi.net/pilot/gateways/cp0312pet.html Real PETA is not amused by People Eating Tasty Animals home page.
Scroll to Top

Megan Tay

Associate (legal) 

Intellectual Property, Commercial, M&A, Litigation

Bio: Ms. Tay joined Agmon Law after acquiring her experience in a number of international law firms and has completed her training at one of the largest Singapore law firms. She has experience in litigation and intellectual property, and her practices focuses on trademarks prosecution and litigation, as well as commercial law. 

Admissions: Waiting Admission – Member of the Bar of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Singapore since 2026.

Memberships: 

Education: Law LLB from National University of Singapore– 2024

Languages: English, Chinese.

Liangshu Huang

Patent Associate

Intellectual Property, Patents, Litigation Support

Bio: Mr. Huang joined Agmon Law after working in an international patent law firm in Singapore. Mr. Huang assists with patent related drafting and prosecution including in the fields of medical devices, mechanical, biotech, software related inventions, CRI, physics, and defense. Mr. Huang brings to the team the experience and precision required in the field of patents. 

Education: Graduate Certificate in Intellectual Property Law, National University of Singapore (2015-2016)

MRES in Translational Medicine, Imperial College London (2009-2010)

Upper 2nd Class Honors in Biomedical Sciences, University of Bradford (2006-2008)

Languages: English, Chinese and Malay.

Jonathan Agmon

Founder & Director

Intellectual Property, Commercial, M&A, Litigation

Bio: With thirty over years of experience Jonathan specializes in intellectual property, commercial law and litigation. Jonathan established Agmon Law in 2025 after 25 years with Soroker Agmon Nordman, which he co-founded. He is a technologist-turned-lawyer and has represented numerous companies over the years. Aside from prosecution and transactional work, Jonathan also handles contentious matters such as oppositions and cancellations proceedings, and acts both as counsel and arbitrator in litigation, mediations and arbitration. His technology background is in computing and he still codes today having coded some of the Firm’s systems. 

Admissions: Foreign Registered Lawyer (Singapore) – 2016; Attorney and Counselor at Law (New York, United States) – 1996; Advocate, (Israel) – 1995

U.S. District Court, Southern and Northern District of New York; United States Court of Federal Claims.

Memberships: Member of CIArb; Internet Committee at ECTA – European Communities Trademark Association; APAA, INTA (Pro Bono Comittee); Domain Name Panelist (WIPO, FORUM, ADNDRC (HK), ISOC-IL, MFSD)

Education: Master of Laws (LL.M. Intellectual Property), George Washington University Law School – 1996; Bachelor of Laws (LL.B. Hons.), University of East London – 1993; Beijing Languages University: Chinese (Mandarin) – 2009

Languages: English, Hebrew, Chinese-Mandarin (Work in progress), Japanese (working on it…)